ITC 300 PUT ALMOST ACHIEVED 1ST TGTFOR MORE CALLS FILL UP THE FORM GIVEN HERE>>>>
For almost every stock or index whose options trade on an exchange, puts are more costly than calls.
Clarification: When comparing options whose strike prices are equally far out
of the money (OTM), the puts carry a higher premium than the calls. They also
have a higher Delta.
·
This
is the result of volatility skew.
Let's see how this works with a typical example.
·
SPX
(the Standard & Poor’s 500 Stock Index) is currently trading near 1891.76
(but the same principle holds whenever you look at the data).
·
The
1940 call (48 points OTM) that expires in 23 days costs $19.00 (bid/ask
midpoint)
The 1840 put (50 points OTM) that expires in 23 days costs $25.00
The 1840 put (50 points OTM) that expires in 23 days costs $25.00
The
difference between $1,920 and $2,610 is quite substantial, especially when the
put is 2 points farther out of the money. Of course, this favors the bullish
investor who can buy single options at a relatively favorable price. On the
other hand, the bearish investor who wants to own single options must pay a
penalty when buying put options.
In a
normal, rational universe, this situation would never occur, and those options
listed above would trade at prices that were much nearer to each other. Sure,
interest rates affect option prices (calls cost more when rates are higher),
but with interest rates near zero, that is not a factor for today's trader.
So
why are the puts inflated? Or if you prefer, you may ask: why are calls
deflated?
The
answer is that there is volatility skew. In other words,
·
As the
strike price declines, implied
volatility increases.
·
As
the strike price increases, implied volatility declines.
Why does this Happen?
Over the years that options have been trading on an exchange (since 1973), market observers noticed one hugely important situation: Even though markets were bullish overall and the market always rebounded to new highs at some future time, when the market did decline, those declines were (on average) more sudden and more severe.
Over the years that options have been trading on an exchange (since 1973), market observers noticed one hugely important situation: Even though markets were bullish overall and the market always rebounded to new highs at some future time, when the market did decline, those declines were (on average) more sudden and more severe.